Thank you for letting us know. We will review this comment.

COOKIES & PRIVACY POLICY

Female trouble

Gender-testing of female athletes is unfair and unfounded but the International Olympic Committee insists on it

Georgina Sturge

Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:04:57 GMT | Updated today

In 2009 South African middle-distance runner Caster Semenya was made to undergo a medical test to prove that she was female, after her masculine looks and athletic prowess aroused suspicion following her victory at the World Championships. Now 'cleared' and free to compete in women's sport, we may wonder whether she ever would have been subjected to such an intrusive and humiliating ordeal had she looked more traditionally feminine.
 
In advance of the London Olympics which starts this week, the International Olympic Committee, which governs the event, has published new regulations on the gender-testing of female athletes which would ban women from competing in the games if the amount of testosterone in their bodies exceeds a certain level.
 
According to the IOC high levels of androgens, of which testosterone is one, in the female body can give the sportswoman in question an unfair advantage. Their rules allow for any female athlete to be nominated by a medical professional to undergo a test for hyperandrogenism, a condition associated with being intersex.
 
Supposedly, the presence of high levels of these hormones produces the equivalent effect of a female athlete 'doping' with performance-enhancing drugs. If discovered to naturally produce levels of androgens that fall within what is considered to be the 'male' range she may, they add, continue to compete if she agrees to take medication which will artificially lower them. Going even further, if a female athlete is revealed to be intersex, they may still find her eligible to compete in men's sports.
 
Laughable as they are, these are the official rules that will apply to female athletes at London 2012. But as The Guardian was quick to note, this farcical policy does nothing but sanction the victimisation of female athletes who deviate from gender norms, and justifies itself on a very shaky medical premise.
 
Having high testosterone levels in a woman may give her a slight natural advantage, but why on earth do they perceive a need to root out what most would imagine is a very small number of athletes who are intersex, in the process harassing women whose physical characteristics are so 'masculine' as to invite the suspicion of the official Olympics gender police?
 
How utterly ridiculous to suggest that someone should have to artificially lower their hormone levels to be considered woman enough to compete in their sport. Do we propose to lop off swimmers' toes if they go over a certain shoe size, therefore giving them an unfair paddle-like advantage?
 
As The Guardian goes on to point out, there is a fair amount of overlap between the 'normal' testosterone levels of female and male athletes: in a study commissioned by the IOC, it was found that 8% of female athletes' levels fell above the 'female' range - more surprisingly, 25% of male athlete's testosterone levels fell well below the 'male' range, with a fair number falling within the 'female' range.
 
Are they threatening to ban all men who have too little testosterone, on the grounds that they aren't 'male' enough to compete in men's sports? Of course not. There is simply no equivalent proposal for male athletes to be called on to prove their biological sex.
 
And what are the requirements for submitting someone for a gender test? The regulations don't specify; they merely ask for the presentation of evidence, which I think we can reasonably assume would be along the lines of, 'Well, she's kind of hard to peg.'
 
The motives which inspired these regulations may well be perfectly harmless however the fact that they made it unchallenged into the Olympic rulebook reflects a disturbing insensitivity towards feminist views on gender, not to mention an extraordinarily narrow view of the relationship between gender and biological sex.
 
It is hard enough for female athletes to be taken seriously and treated equally when they are under constant pressure from the press, and their own sporting associations, to show a 'feminine' side to their strength and toughness (and invariably this involves taking off a few more articles of clothing).
 
When sport gets over its insecurity about what it means to be a 'real' woman, and stops fighting against gender non-conformity, then, who knows, we might even see a few more lesbian athletes come out of the woodwork. Until then shall we just enjoy the show?

More images

Video

DIVA Linked Stories

Comments