Thank you for letting us know. We will review this comment.

COOKIES & PRIVACY POLICY

Where are all the women?

That was what the Guardian's Kira Cochrane asked as she revealed statistics that confirmed women are all but invisible in British public life

Hannah Bass

Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:33:56 GMT | Updated 1 years today

Here's a question with an even bleaker answer: where are all the lesbians?

 

Cochrane conducted a  "diversity audit" and came up with some depressing, though not altogether surprising figures. She found that on average only 22% of newspaper articles are written by women, 28% of contributors on Question Time are women and just 16% of contributors to Radio 4's agenda-setting Today programme are women.

 

So far, so depressing. But while Cochrane points out the even greater scarcity of ethnic minority women in British public life, gay women are not even included in her study. Are we that invisible?

 

We can all think of plenty of out gay men in the public eye but when it comes to the girls, we're counting on one hand. Clare Balding and Alice Arnold? Celesbians Melanie Rickey and Mary Portas? Cochrane didn't break down the figures so we can't be sure how many of the journalists she counted are gay, but if the stats are bad for women, they're going to be even worse for lesbians.

 

What we do know is that 22% of MPs are female and that, in the entire House of Commons, only three MPs are out lesbians.

 

Cochrane quotes Nan Sloane, director of the Centre for Women and Democracy, saying: "You have 51% of the population paying equal taxes who are not equally represented when it comes to deciding how their money is spent ... If you had more women involved, they'd be more likely to pick up those nuances at an early stage and bring their experience to bear…"

 

If Sloane is right, that having more women in government leads to more women-friendly policies, then we should be worried both about the lack of women but also the lack of lesbians. With a continuing gender pay gap and women worst hit by government cuts, two-women households suffer disproportionately.

 

Then there are issues at the heart of the LGBT community: laws concerning civil partnership and same-sex marriage, sex education and dealing with homophobic bullying in our schools. Aren't these issues where the lesbian community should be represented by other lesbians, for whom equality is a passion born from experience? As Julie Bindel told Pink News: "The straight people aren't going to fight this battle for us."

 

And as Cochrane points out, the presence of women in the public eye is still all too often dictated by whether or not they're attractive to men - so out lesbians provide an even bigger conundrum. It's bad enough that women grow up with a media that views them as the "other".

 

For gay women, it's even worse. Our invisibility in the public eye is as much a part of the struggle for acceptance and normalisation as the fight to combat prejudice in schools and in the workplace. It's not a case of "role models"; we just need to see more gay women making the news and more gay women reporting it, until it's no big deal.

More images

Video

DIVA Linked Stories

Comments