Thank you for letting us know. We will review this comment.

COOKIES & PRIVACY POLICY

Wtf?! Weekly

A new ABC show and an Australian tennis star spark outrage, and Dear Deirdre says we’re all a bit bi… it must be DIVA’s weekly mediawatch.

Paris Lees

Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:27:40 GMT | Updated 1 years today

COURT CONTROVERSY

Former tennis star Margaret Court has said she doesn't think gay people should be allowed to marry and stuff because of, ya know, God and that. Speaking to The Western Australian newspaper, she described gay marriages as "alternative, unhealthy, unnatural unions," and an attempt to: "legitimize what God calls abominable sexual practices that include sodomy." Well we all know what we think of that, right? It's got another tennis legend, Martina Navratilova, well miffed. She said: "Her myopic view is truly frightening as well as damaging to the thousands of children already living in same-gender families." Martina says she also tried to talk to Margaret: "But to say she's completely close-minded on the issue is an understatement." Billie Jean King also condemned Court's remarks: "We have to commit to eliminating homophobia because everyone is entitled to the same rights, opportunities and protection." Campaigner Stuart Ross is calling for sports authorities to take a stand against Court's bigotry. He said: "Three measures can easily be developed very quickly: i) the Victorian Government in Australia can revoke the name of the Margaret Court stadium in Melbourne…. ii) the All England Tennis Club can revoke Margaret Court's entitlement to use Wimbledon tennis courts at will and iii) the Victorian government, the All England Tennis Club and other interested agencies such as Sport England, Tennis Australia can make a public statement condemning the homophobia being portrayed by Margaret Court." Well said. The only question is: why hasn't this happened already?

10balls.com

 
DEAR DEIRDRE

Last week we looked at the Mail's problem page, which featured the concerned mother of a lesbian teen. Now a young lady-lovin' lass has popped up in the Sun's advice column, Dear Deirdre, prompting Deirdre to declare that "Most of us have at least some bisexual feelings". Blimey. Is that the Sun's official line now? And there was me thinking it was written solely for teenage boys, of the strictly heterosexual variety.

 

Nevertheless, she answers a few classics: "I had a threesome with my boyfriend and one of his female work colleagues, and now I'm falling in love with her." Well duh: once you've had muff, you can't get enough. Indeed, seems this woman has been regularly having it off with her new gal pal ever since. But what does dear old Deirdre suggest? Well, to make a choice: "You need to work out whether this is just sexual infatuation or true love, or at least a sign that you're going to be happier in relationships with women than men." How could anyone possibly predict that? Surely the only relevant question is if someone's going to be happy with the person they're with, not women or men in general. But what do I know? I haven't read Deirdre's "Bisexual Issues" leaflet, which she's promised to send off to her advice-seeker. Wouldn't you just love a copy?

The Sun

WORKING FOR THE MAN

Some queer campaigners have become outraged by ABC's new show Work It - before it's even aired. Writing for AfterEllen.com, Heather Hogan predicts the show will "make a giant joke out of stereotypes that continue to damage the transgender community." Hogan is clearly coming from a good place on this, but I think her anger is slightly misplaced. As a trans woman, I simply don't see how the men in this show have anything at all to do with me or my life. People have a right to be offended by Work It because of the misogyny indicated in the trailer, and people also have a right to be offended because it looks, quite frankly, like utter crap. But what has it got to do with trans people? Banning this show - as GLAAD and the HRC have called for - is a deeply problematic response. Are we then saying that all cross-dressing humour is offensive? In which case, will people be calling for an end to panto next, or indeed drag? Perhaps there is a case for that. In a society which celebrated gender diversity, this sort of thing probably wouldn't be seen as quite so funny. Nevertheless, I'm more upset with what Work It says about women in general. Let's hope it pans.

Afterellen

More images

Video

DIVA Linked Stories

Comments