Thank you for letting us know. We will review this comment.

COOKIES & PRIVACY POLICY

Anger as Sweden continues to sterilise trans people

Members of the Swedish government have announced they will not change the current law requesting transgender people to undergo sterilisation.

Bella Qvist

Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:47:05 GMT | Updated 1 years today

Members of the Swedish government have announced they will not change the current law requesting transgender people to undergo sterilisation.

A majority of the Swedish Parliament is for an abolishment of the law but a small conservative party is putting a halt to the change.

Human Rights Watch has called it a crime against humanity, members of the European Parliament have urged the Swedish Parliament to change the law and All Out organisation has launched a campaign attempting to change Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt's mind.

The 1972 law being kept in force states that a person wanting their gender reconsidered by the state has to be over 18 years old, unmarried and sterilised.

Transgender persons are also banned from storing sperm or eggs in a sperm/egg bank for future use.

Annika Eclund, LGBT spokesperson from Kristdemokraterna, the party responsible for the deadlock, has previously told Swedish radio she "doesn't entirely understand why it would go against human rights".

"If I as a female feel I am really a man and want to change gender, then it is pretty natural that as a father I would not be able to give birth," she said.

The news hit hard in a country that still remembers its dark past of a state-enforced eugenistic sterilisation-programme ending as late as 1976.

The Swedish PM has previously said he thinks sterilisation belongs to a dark, distant, time and political commentators are wondering whether the current deadlock is an attempt at keeping peace within the coalition Parliament.

Speaking exclusively to DIVA and Pink Paper, Ulrika Westerlund, head of The Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights said today:

"We are trying with all means to stop there being an official Parliament agreement to keep the law…it is unacceptable to negotiate with human rights like this. This law should have been torn up a long time ago and it is unworthy of a democracy to have to discuss whether we should have forced sterlisation of people or not."

Jane Fae, campaigner on issues of sexual rights, said: "It is to be hoped that the Swedish Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt, currently in thrall to a small reactionary right-wing party, will pluck up the courage to resist their pressure and allow reform through his parliament.

"However, we should not overlook the fact that despite Human Rights declarations to the contrary, in Europe and elsewhere, the requirement for surgery that effectively sterilises an individual before they can be recognised in their identified gender, is pretty widespread, throughout much of Europe and the United States.

"Or worse, as in states like Tennessee, gender assertion is not recognised at all, no matter what an individual does."

Forced sterilisation breaches Article 3 of EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Erik Ullenhag, Swedish Minster of Integration, has denied that a final decision has been made on the matter.

More images

Video

DIVA Linked Stories

Comments