Thank you for letting us know. We will review this comment.

COOKIES & PRIVACY POLICY

I'm not a better person for being straight, says Jack Straw

As the religious debate on same-sex marriage continues to reach fever pitch, Labour politician Jack Straw has publicly defended gay rights.

Peter Lloyd

Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:16:50 GMT | Updated 1 years today

As the religious debate on same-sex marriage continues to reach fever pitch, Labour politician Jack Straw has publicly defended gay rights.

 

Writing in the Lancashire Telegraph, the former Foreign Secretary said that being born heterosexual does not make him a better person - and that, as a result, he shold not be privy to special treatment.

 

He also goes on to say that religions should operate on their principle of mutual love and respect, which often appears lacking in the debate on homosexuality.

 

"Given the key importance of these ideas to Christianity, why are some church leaders - in the Roman Catholic and Anglican Churches in particular - not practicing what Christ taught, on the issue of people's sexuality?" he writes.

 

"I happen to be, in the modern jargon, "straight". It doesn't make me a better person. I didn't choose to be straight. It's how I am. It would be no different if I were gay.

 

"I would neither be a better, nor a worse, person because of it. It would simply be how I was." 

 

The comments come as religious leaders in Ireland are gathering to discuss the validity of gay clergy - and just weeks ahead of the UK government's consultation on same-sex weddings.

 

He added: "Because I am straight, I have a right to marry a woman. But if I were a gay man, or a lesbian woman, in love with another gay man, or lesbian woman, I can get to a half-way house with a "civil partnership", but the law currently says that I cannot marry.

 

"Some Church leaders say the law should stay that way, on the spurious grounds that the sanctity and importance of heterosexual marriage will somehow be damaged. How, why?I know of no-one who is married who feels threatened by the idea that another couple, same sex, wishes to cement their love for each other by marrying."

 

Published yesterday, the comments have garnered both praise and condemnation.

 

One man, Joseph Yossarian, wrote: "Not very often you'll hear me say this Jack, but you are absolutely spot on. I had the pleasure of attending the civil ceremony of one of your colleagues in the house of commons.

"It was a happy occasion and only a cynic (such as I) would feel the slightly sour taste of a former vicar not being allowed to marry in a church."

 

"Not very often you'll hear me say this Jack, but you are absolutely spot on. I had the pleasure of attending the civil ceremony of one of your colleagues in the house of commons. It was a happy occasion and only a cynic (such as I) would feel the slightly sour taste of a former vicar not being allowed to marry in a church."

 

Meanwhile, an anonymous poster responded: "I vehemently disagree with you Jack and I believe that you have cynically used the words from the gospel in such a way to justify your argument."

 

More images

Video

DIVA Linked Stories

Comments